ok this article is critical of the new supply side but we can research some of the advocates mentioned in the article
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/business/20view.html
also here is an article published by stern on the matter
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~nroubini/SUPPLY.HTM
this blog talks about how tax cuts could be the solution to the current automaker crisis
http://kudlowsmoneypolitics.blogspot.com/
this is a good article that is pro demand side- it points out everything and anything wrong with supply side- so this is basically everything the other side will say
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0514-20.htm
here are some pros and cons of reaganomics
http://www.youdebate.com/DEBATES/REAGANOMICS.HTM
this is probably the best one- it is published by cato and it has some hard facts that are pro reaganomics
Monday, December 8, 2008
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Great article why a New-Deal style policy would be bad
Hey. Here's an article from the Wall Street Journal about why a New-Deal style policy would not work right now. It also argues why the government cannot ignore the private sector.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122792327402265913.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122792327402265913.html
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
More Reaganomics
Hey guys, I'm sorry I forgot about it yesterday... so here's my info
1) http://www.theonion.com/content/news/reaganomics_finally_trickles_down
(this article is perfect as an example of how Reaganomics works for the long run)
2)http://www.rutledgecapital.com/Articles/20040611_the_real_reaganomics.htm
3)http://lvb.net/item/820
and I can't go to the meeting tomorrow, cuz i have class, but if you need me to do research or organize just email me or text me 516-859-1680
1) http://www.theonion.com/content/news/reaganomics_finally_trickles_down
(this article is perfect as an example of how Reaganomics works for the long run)
2)http://www.rutledgecapital.com/Articles/20040611_the_real_reaganomics.htm
3)http://lvb.net/item/820
and I can't go to the meeting tomorrow, cuz i have class, but if you need me to do research or organize just email me or text me 516-859-1680
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Debt/Deficit Spending and Capital Investment
Hey guys,
Here are some of the websites I've found.
Debt/Deficit Spending:
http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2003/06/mcauley.html
http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/10/21/f-deficit.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9403E6DE1E30F93AA25752C1A9649C8B63
http://economistmom.com/2008/10/how-deficit-spending-can-be-fiscally-responsible/ (This is a blog post, but the author makes some really good points, and the post has links to some good articles, so I won't post those article links separately.)
Capital Investment:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=910527
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0254/is_n2_v57/ai_20824080/print?tag=artBody;col1
http://www.aednet.org/government/washington-policy-issues-detail.cfm?id=30
http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/1005taxes_gale.aspx (I like this one)
http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&piPK=64165421&theSitePK=469382&menuPK=64216926&entityID=000009265_3961001125425
Here are some of the websites I've found.
Debt/Deficit Spending:
http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2003/06/mcauley.html
http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/10/21/f-deficit.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9403E6DE1E30F93AA25752C1A9649C8B63
http://economistmom.com/2008/10/how-deficit-spending-can-be-fiscally-responsible/ (This is a blog post, but the author makes some really good points, and the post has links to some good articles, so I won't post those article links separately.)
Capital Investment:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=910527
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0254/is_n2_v57/ai_20824080/print?tag=artBody;col1
http://www.aednet.org/government/washington-policy-issues-detail.cfm?id=30
http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2001/1005taxes_gale.aspx (I like this one)
http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&piPK=64165421&theSitePK=469382&menuPK=64216926&entityID=000009265_3961001125425
Support for Bush tax cuts and correlation between business investment and job creation
Hey guys! Here are a few links to articles and pdfs that I thought would be useful. The last one I think is quite good. There is also an article in which Alan Greenspan supports the tax cuts (yay!).
Time:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,93050,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998898,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,96955,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,98339,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,99243,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,101646,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,101776,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999402,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999525,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999555,00.html
NY Times:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999555,00.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D02E6DE113EF93AA35752C0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&&scp=6&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/28/politics/28DEMS.html?ex=1226552400&en=f1893c2ecbce1d16&ei=5070
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/07/politics/07ASSE.html?ex=1226552400&en=9f8f2c4fc5b343f3&ei=5070
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/bush-tax-cut-mythology/?scp=11&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse (!!!!!)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9407E0D9113AF930A25751C0A9629C8B63&scp=12&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse (!!!!!!!!!!!)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0DE3DD163AF931A25751C0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&&scp=20&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse
(“the economy probably does not need any short-term stimulus” à what we’re talking about?)
bls.gov:
http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2004/03/art1full.pdf
http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2004/02/art2full.pdf (“Based on the assumptions used in developing economic projections, real GDP is expected to grow during the next decade, while productivity remains strong and inflation remains stable”)
http://www.bls.gov/oes/2004/november/naics4_525900.htm
http://www.bls.gov/ore/pdf/ec040020.pdf (“Instead, the evidence suggests that a large drop in business investment may explain the decline in job creation”àShows a direct relationship between business investment and job creation, which in turn affects income, which in turn affects consumptionètrickle-down)
Time:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,93050,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998898,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,96955,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,98339,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,99243,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,101646,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,101776,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999402,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999525,00.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999555,00.html
NY Times:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999555,00.html
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D02E6DE113EF93AA35752C0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&&scp=6&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/28/politics/28DEMS.html?ex=1226552400&en=f1893c2ecbce1d16&ei=5070
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/07/politics/07ASSE.html?ex=1226552400&en=9f8f2c4fc5b343f3&ei=5070
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/bush-tax-cut-mythology/?scp=11&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse (!!!!!)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9407E0D9113AF930A25751C0A9629C8B63&scp=12&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse (!!!!!!!!!!!)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0DE3DD163AF931A25751C0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&&scp=20&sq=support%20for%20bush%20taxes%20in%202001&st=cse
(“the economy probably does not need any short-term stimulus” à what we’re talking about?)
bls.gov:
http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2004/03/art1full.pdf
http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2004/02/art2full.pdf (“Based on the assumptions used in developing economic projections, real GDP is expected to grow during the next decade, while productivity remains strong and inflation remains stable”)
http://www.bls.gov/oes/2004/november/naics4_525900.htm
http://www.bls.gov/ore/pdf/ec040020.pdf (“Instead, the evidence suggests that a large drop in business investment may explain the decline in job creation”àShows a direct relationship between business investment and job creation, which in turn affects income, which in turn affects consumptionètrickle-down)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)